Skip to content
Enrique Tomás Martínez Beltrán
HomeResearchPublicationsTopicsTeachingBlog
Contact
EN/ES
HomeResearchPublicationsTopicsTeachingBlogContact
EN/ES

Enrique Tomás Martínez Beltrán

Postdoctoral research in AI, cybersecurity and federated learning, spanning threat analysis, closed-loop cyberdefense and trustworthy decentralized learning.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Google Scholaropens in a new tab
  • ORCIDopens in a new tab
  • LinkedInopens in a new tab
  • GitHubopens in a new tab
All profiles
  • ResearchGateopens in a new tab
  • Scopusopens in a new tab
  • DBLPopens in a new tab
  • Web of Scienceopens in a new tab

Enrique Tomás Martínez Beltrán. All rights reserved.

Back to top

This site loads optional analytics from Google and external analytics providers only if you accept. You can decline and continue using the site normally.

  1. Home
  2. Research Notes on Federated Learning, Cybersecurity and Cyberdefense
  3. Federated Energy Anomaly Detection for Critical Infrastructure
Industrial CybersecurityCritical InfrastructureDecentralized Federated LearningTrustworthy AI

Federated Energy Anomaly Detection for Critical Infrastructure

Privacy-aware cyberattack detection for smart-grid time series

Enrique Tomás Martínez Beltrán

Postdoctoral Researcher in Computer Science

May 25, 20266 min read
  • LinkedInopens in a new tab
  • Xopens in a new tab
Federated Energy Anomaly Detection for Critical Infrastructure

Critical infrastructure operators need anomaly detection, but they also need privacy and operational control. In energy systems, raw telemetry may expose substations, load profiles, operational routines and sensitive fault patterns.

Federated anomaly detection is a way to collaborate without pooling everything.

Why energy systems are different

Smart-grid telemetry is temporal, heterogeneous and context-dependent. The same signal can be normal in one operational state and suspicious in another.

That means detection models need context:

  • threat level,
  • asset criticality,
  • seasonality,
  • model drift,
  • local operating constraints.

Decentralized learning pattern

Each monitoring node can train on local time-series data and share model updates or distilled signals with peers. The goal is to detect cyberattacks and anomalies while preserving control over sensitive industrial data.

This is not just a privacy feature. It is also an availability and resilience feature: the system should keep learning even when a central service is unavailable.

Trustworthy alerts

The alert should explain why a signal matters and whether the model is operating in a familiar regime. If drift is high, the alert should say so. If peers disagree, that disagreement is part of the evidence.

Trustworthy anomaly detection is not only about raising alerts. It is about making alerts useful enough to support mitigation.

For critical infrastructure, alert evidence must remain constrained and auditable: affected asset, anomaly window, peer agreement, drift level, safety constraints and approved operational context.

Key takeaway

In critical infrastructure, federated anomaly detection should prioritize useful, bounded evidence over broad data sharing. The alert must be explainable, auditable and aligned with operational constraints so operators can decide whether to investigate, mitigate or keep observing.

Open research question

How can federated energy systems distinguish true cyber anomalies from local operational changes when raw telemetry cannot be pooled centrally?

Related Research

Robust Decentralized Federated Learning: Limits and Open Questions

August 13, 2026

Robust Decentralized Federated Learning: Limits and Open Questions

A measured research agenda for dynamic topologies, manipulated context, formal privacy analysis and external validity in robust DFL.

Designing a Decentralized Federated Learning System

August 7, 2026

Designing a Decentralized Federated Learning System

A design checklist for decentralized federated learning systems that connects network topology, exchanged representations, trust policies and measurable system goals.