Skip to content
Enrique Tomás Martínez Beltrán
HomeResearchPublicationsTeachingBlog
ENES
Contact
HomeResearchPublicationsTeachingBlog
ENES
Contact

Enrique Tomás Martínez Beltrán

Federated learning, trustworthy AI and cyberdefense research, focused on systems that are robust, privacy-preserving and useful in security operations.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Accessibility Statement
  • GitHubopens in a new tab
  • LinkedInopens in a new tab
  • Google Scholaropens in a new tab
  • ResearchGateopens in a new tab
  • ORCIDopens in a new tab
  • Scopusopens in a new tab
  • DBLPopens in a new tab
  • Web of Scienceopens in a new tab

Enrique Tomás Martínez Beltrán. All rights reserved.

Back to top

This site loads optional analytics from Google and external analytics providers only if you accept. You can decline and continue using the site normally.

  1. Home
  2. Publications on Federated Learning, AI and Cybersecurity
  3. Decentralized Federated Learning: Fundamentals, State of the Art, Frameworks, Trends, and Challenges
Journal article2023

IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials

Decentralized Federated Learning: Fundamentals, State of the Art, Frameworks, Trends, and Challenges

In recent years, Federated Learning (FL) has gained relevance in training collaborative models without sharing sensitive data. Since its birth, Centralized FL (CFL) has been the most common approach in the literature, wh...

Publisher Pageopens in a new tabDOIopens in a new tab
Scientific Overview
Share
  • LinkedInopens in a new tab
  • Xopens in a new tab
SurveysData modelsSecurityFederated learningTutorialsServersOptimizationDecentralized federated learningcommunication mechanismssecurity and privacykey performance indicatorsframeworksapplication scenarios
Scientific overview
Live • Tick 0
Decentralized Federated Learning concept loopVisualizes the shift from centralized aggregator-based architectures to peer-to-peer learning topologies, taxonics, and design guidelines.Federation architectureNetwork topologyCommunication mechanismsSecurity & privacyKPIsOptimizationCommunication overheadNon-IID dataTrust & attacksNode failuresHeterogeneityScalabilityDesign DimensionsSN1N2N3N4N5N6PFully connectedStarRingRandomClusteredDFLFOUNDATION

Survey Lens • Phase 1 of 7

Centralized FL

Clients train locally, then depend on a central aggregation server.

Key Application Domains

HealthcareIndustry 4.0Mobile servicesMilitaryVehicles
  1. Centralized FL

  2. Remove central server

  3. Decentralized learning

  4. Topology taxonomy

  5. Design dimensions

  6. Open challenges

  7. DFL foundation

Scientific overview
RQ1

Establishes the diagnostic layer of the thesis: DFL can reduce dependence on a central aggregation entity, but decentralization redistributes coordination, communication, trust, robustness and performance-assessment responsibilities across participants.

View animation

3

federation architectures

CFL, DFL and SDFL characterized and compared across bottlenecks, trust and topology flexibility

5

network topologies

Fully connected, ring, random, star and clustered, evaluated across convergence, robustness and communication overhead

5

application scenarios

Healthcare, industry, mobile services, military UAV and IoV scenarios mapped to DFL fundamentals

6

open challenges

Communication overhead, non-IID data, trust and attacks, node failures, heterogeneity and scalability

Key Scientific Contributions

  • Unified Taxonomy: Organizes DFL architectures, topologies, communication mechanisms and coordination assumptions.
  • Design Dimensions Analysis: Reviews security, privacy, optimization mechanisms, KPIs and resource trade-offs.
  • Framework Comparison: Compares available frameworks and application scenarios to identify trends, lessons learned and open challenges.

Major Conclusions

  • DFL reduces dependence on a central aggregation entity, but it also redistributes coordination, communication, trust and evaluation responsibilities.
  • Practical DFL adoption requires mechanisms specifically designed for decentralized and heterogeneous environments.
  • The survey provides the diagnostic basis for the later technical work on adversarial reliability and multimodal heterogeneity.

Architecture Comparison

AspectCentralized FL (CFL)Decentralized FL (DFL)
BottleneckCentral server (high)P2P distributed
Failure pointSingle point of failureNo central aggregator dependency
TopologiesFixed star / hubFlexible (ring, clustered)

Methodology phases

1

Map

DFL fundamentals, topologies and frameworks

2

Diagnose

Limits, KPIs, security and privacy gaps

3

Prioritize

Robustness, heterogeneity and communication efficiency

Abstract

In recent years, Federated Learning (FL) has gained relevance in training collaborative models without sharing sensitive data. Since its birth, Centralized FL (CFL) has been the most common approach in the literature, where a central entity creates a global model. However, a centralized approach leads to increased latency due to bottlenecks, heightened vulnerability to system failures, and trustworthiness concerns affecting the entity responsible for the global model creation. Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) emerged to address these concerns by promoting decentralized model aggregation and minimizing reliance on centralized architectures. However, despite the work done in DFL, the literature has not (i) studied the main aspects differentiating DFL and CFL; (ii) analyzed DFL frameworks to create and evaluate new solutions; and (iii) reviewed application scenarios using DFL. Thus, this article identifies and analyzes the main fundamentals of DFL in terms of federation architectures, topologies, communication mechanisms, security approaches, and key performance indicators. Additionally, the paper at hand explores existing mechanisms to optimize critical DFL fundamentals. Then, the most relevant features of the current DFL frameworks are reviewed and compared. After that, it analyzes the most used DFL application scenarios, identifying solutions based on the fundamentals and frameworks previously defined. Finally, the evolution of existing DFL solutions is studied to provide a list of trends, lessons learned, and open challenges.

Authors

Enrique Tomás Martínez BeltránMario Quiles PérezPedro Miguel Sánchez SánchezSergio López BernalGérôme BovetManuel Gil PérezGregorio Martínez PérezAlberto Huertas Celdrán

Keywords

SurveysData modelsSecurityFederated learningTutorialsServersOptimizationDecentralized federated learningcommunication mechanismssecurity and privacykey performance indicatorsframeworksapplication scenarios

Related publications

Works with stronger overlap in topic, type, and tags.

Conference paper2025

ICC 2025 - IEEE International Conference on Communications

ProFe: Communication-Efficient Decentralized Federated Learning via Distillation and Prototypes

Pedro Miguel Sánchez Sánchez, Enrique Tomás Martínez Beltrán, Miguel Fernández Llamas, Gérôme Bovet, Gregorio Martínez Pérez, Alberto Huertas Celdrán

Publisher Pageopens in a new tabDOIopens in a new tab
Journal article2025

IEEE Communications Magazine

Flighter: Decentralized Federated Learning and Situational Awareness for Secure Military Aerial Reconnaissance

Enrique Tomás Martínez Beltrán, Pedro Miguel Sánchez Sánchez, Gérôme Bovet, Burkhard Stiller, Gregorio Martínez Pérez, Alberto Huertas Celdrán

Mosaic warfare is a military strategy where reconnaissance missions with aerial vehicles are critical for gathering enemy information and achieving battlefield dominance. Nowadays, machine learning (ML) techniques play a...

Publisher Pageopens in a new tabDOIopens in a new tab
Journal article2024

Array

DART: A Solution for decentralized federated learning model robustness analysis

Chao Feng, Alberto Huertas Celdrán, Jan von der Assen, Enrique Tomás Martínez Beltrán, Gérôme Bovet, Burkhard Stiller

Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising approach to address privacy concerns inherent in Machine Learning (ML) practices. However, conventional FL methods, particularly those following the Centralized FL (CFL)...

Publisher Pageopens in a new tabDOIopens in a new tab

Related Research

COBRA V2: Gamified and Customizable Hyperrealistic Cyber Range Simulations of APTs

Nov 2025 — Jun 2026

COBRA V2: Gamified and Customizable Hyperrealistic Cyber Range Simulations of APTs

Develops adaptive training environments and realistic Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) simulation tools using gamification mechanics.

DEFENDIS: Decentralized Federated Learning for IoT Device Identification and Security

Apr 2023 — Nov 2023

DEFENDIS: Decentralized Federated Learning for IoT Device Identification and Security

DEFENDIS develops a framework for uniquely identifying IoT devices in a distributed manner while solving security threats through decentralized federated learning.

ECYSAP EYE: European Cyber Situational Awareness Platform - Enhanced Cyberspace Operations

Nov 2024 — Jan 2028

ECYSAP EYE: European Cyber Situational Awareness Platform - Enhanced Cyberspace Operations

An architectural evolution of the European cyber situational awareness platform into a modular System of Systems to support military missions.