Journal article2023

IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials

Decentralized Federated Learning: Fundamentals, State of the Art, Frameworks, Trends, and Challenges

In recent years, Federated Learning (FL) has gained relevance in training collaborative models without sharing sensitive data. Since its birth, Centralized FL (CFL) has been the most common approach in the literature,...

SurveysData modelsSecurityFederated learningTutorialsServersOptimizationDecentralized federated learningcommunication mechanismssecurity and privacykey performance indicatorsframeworksapplication scenarios
Scientific overview

Decentralized Federated Learning foundation

Live / Tick 0
Decentralized Federated Learning concept loopVisualizes the shift from centralized aggregator-based architectures to node-to-node learning topologies, taxonomy, and design guidelines.Federation architectureNetwork topologyCommunication mechanismsSecurity & privacyKPIsOptimizationCommunication overheadNon-IID dataTrust & attacksNode failuresHeterogeneityScalabilityDesign DimensionsSN1N2N3N4N5N6PFully connectedStarRingRandomClusteredDFLFOUNDATION

Survey lens / Phase 1 of 7

Centralized FL

Clients train locally, then depend on a central aggregation server.

Key Application Domains

HealthcareIndustry 4.0Mobile servicesMilitaryVehicles
  1. 01

    Centralized FL

  2. 02

    Remove central server

  3. 03

    Decentralized learning

  4. 04

    Topology taxonomy

  5. 05

    Design dimensions

  6. 06

    Open challenges

  7. 07

    DFL foundation

Scientific overviewRQ1

Establishes the diagnostic layer of the thesis: DFL can reduce dependence on a central aggregation entity, but decentralization redistributes coordination, communication, trust, robustness and performance-assessment responsibilities across participants.

View animation

3

federation architectures

CFL, DFL and SDFL characterized and compared across bottlenecks, trust and topology flexibility

5

network topologies

Fully connected, ring, random, star and clustered, evaluated across convergence, robustness and communication overhead

5

application scenarios

Healthcare, industry, mobile services, military UAV and IoV scenarios mapped to DFL fundamentals

6

open challenges

Communication overhead, non-IID data, trust and attacks, node failures, heterogeneity and scalability

Key Scientific Contributions

  1. 01Unified Taxonomy:Organizes DFL architectures, topologies, communication mechanisms and coordination assumptions.
  2. 02Design Dimensions Analysis:Reviews security, privacy, optimization mechanisms, KPIs and resource trade-offs.
  3. 03Framework Comparison:Compares available frameworks and application scenarios to identify trends, lessons learned and open challenges.

Major Conclusions

  1. 01DFL reduces dependence on a central aggregation entity, but it also redistributes coordination, communication, trust and evaluation responsibilities.
  2. 02Practical DFL adoption requires mechanisms specifically designed for decentralized and heterogeneous environments.
  3. 03The survey provides the diagnostic basis for the later technical work on adversarial reliability and multimodal heterogeneity.

Architecture Comparison

Bottleneck

Centralized FL (CFL)

Central server (high)

Decentralized FL (DFL)

Node-to-node

Failure point

Centralized FL (CFL)

Single point of failure

Decentralized FL (DFL)

No central aggregator dependency

Topologies

Centralized FL (CFL)

Fixed star / hub

Decentralized FL (DFL)

Flexible (ring, clustered)

Methodology phases

01

Map

DFL fundamentals, topologies and frameworks

02

Diagnose

Limits, KPIs, security and privacy gaps

03

Prioritize

Robustness, heterogeneity and communication efficiency

Abstract

In recent years, Federated Learning (FL) has gained relevance in training collaborative models without sharing sensitive data. Since its birth, Centralized FL (CFL) has been the most common approach in the literature, where a central entity creates a global model. However, a centralized approach leads to increased latency due to bottlenecks, heightened vulnerability to system failures, and trustworthiness concerns affecting the entity responsible for the global model creation. Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) emerged to address these concerns by promoting decentralized model aggregation and minimizing reliance on centralized architectures. However, despite the work done in DFL, the literature has not (i) studied the main aspects differentiating DFL and CFL; (ii) analyzed DFL frameworks to create and evaluate new solutions; and (iii) reviewed application scenarios using DFL. Thus, this article identifies and analyzes the main fundamentals of DFL in terms of federation architectures, topologies, communication mechanisms, security approaches, and key performance indicators. Additionally, the paper at hand explores existing mechanisms to optimize critical DFL fundamentals. Then, the most relevant features of the current DFL frameworks are reviewed and compared. After that, it analyzes the most used DFL application scenarios, identifying solutions based on the fundamentals and frameworks previously defined. Finally, the evolution of existing DFL solutions is studied to provide a list of trends, lessons learned, and open challenges.

Authors

Enrique Tomás Martínez BeltránMario Quiles PérezPedro Miguel Sánchez SánchezSergio López BernalGérôme BovetManuel Gil PérezGregorio Martínez PérezAlberto Huertas Celdrán

Keywords

SurveysData modelsSecurityFederated learningTutorialsServersOptimizationDecentralized federated learningcommunication mechanismssecurity and privacykey performance indicatorsframeworksapplication scenarios

Related publications

Publications connected by topic, method or application.

Journal article2025

IEEE Communications Magazine

Flighter: Decentralized Federated Learning and Situational Awareness for Secure Military Aerial Reconnaissance

Enrique Tomás Martínez Beltrán, Pedro Miguel Sánchez Sánchez, Gérôme Bovet, Burkhard Stiller, Gregorio Martínez Pérez, Alberto Huertas Celdrán

Mosaic warfare is a military strategy where reconnaissance missions with aerial vehicles are critical for gathering enemy information and achieving battlefield dominance. Nowadays, machine learning (ML) techniques pla...

Journal article2024

Array

DART: A Solution for decentralized federated learning model robustness analysis

Chao Feng, Alberto Huertas Celdrán, Jan von der Assen, Enrique Tomás Martínez Beltrán, Gérôme Bovet, Burkhard Stiller

Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising approach to address privacy concerns inherent in Machine Learning (ML) practices. However, conventional FL methods, particularly those following the Centralized FL (C...

Related Research