IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
Decentralized Federated Learning: Fundamentals, State of the Art, Frameworks, Trends, and Challenges
In recent years, Federated Learning (FL) has gained relevance in training collaborative models without sharing sensitive data. Since its birth, Centralized FL (CFL) has been the most common approach in the literature, wh...
Survey Lens • Phase 1 of 7
Centralized FL
Clients train locally, then depend on a central aggregation server.
Key Application Domains
Centralized FL
Remove central server
Decentralized learning
Topology taxonomy
Design dimensions
Open challenges
DFL foundation
Establishes the diagnostic layer of the thesis: DFL can reduce dependence on a central aggregation entity, but decentralization redistributes coordination, communication, trust, robustness and performance-assessment responsibilities across participants.
3
federation architectures
CFL, DFL and SDFL characterized and compared across bottlenecks, trust and topology flexibility
5
network topologies
Fully connected, ring, random, star and clustered, evaluated across convergence, robustness and communication overhead
5
application scenarios
Healthcare, industry, mobile services, military UAV and IoV scenarios mapped to DFL fundamentals
6
open challenges
Communication overhead, non-IID data, trust and attacks, node failures, heterogeneity and scalability
Key Scientific Contributions
- Unified Taxonomy: Organizes DFL architectures, topologies, communication mechanisms and coordination assumptions.
- Design Dimensions Analysis: Reviews security, privacy, optimization mechanisms, KPIs and resource trade-offs.
- Framework Comparison: Compares available frameworks and application scenarios to identify trends, lessons learned and open challenges.
Major Conclusions
- DFL reduces dependence on a central aggregation entity, but it also redistributes coordination, communication, trust and evaluation responsibilities.
- Practical DFL adoption requires mechanisms specifically designed for decentralized and heterogeneous environments.
- The survey provides the diagnostic basis for the later technical work on adversarial reliability and multimodal heterogeneity.
Architecture Comparison
| Aspect | Centralized FL (CFL) | Decentralized FL (DFL) |
|---|---|---|
| Bottleneck | Central server (high) | P2P distributed |
| Failure point | Single point of failure | No central aggregator dependency |
| Topologies | Fixed star / hub | Flexible (ring, clustered) |
Methodology phases
Map
DFL fundamentals, topologies and frameworks
Diagnose
Limits, KPIs, security and privacy gaps
Prioritize
Robustness, heterogeneity and communication efficiency
Abstract
In recent years, Federated Learning (FL) has gained relevance in training collaborative models without sharing sensitive data. Since its birth, Centralized FL (CFL) has been the most common approach in the literature, where a central entity creates a global model. However, a centralized approach leads to increased latency due to bottlenecks, heightened vulnerability to system failures, and trustworthiness concerns affecting the entity responsible for the global model creation. Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) emerged to address these concerns by promoting decentralized model aggregation and minimizing reliance on centralized architectures. However, despite the work done in DFL, the literature has not (i) studied the main aspects differentiating DFL and CFL; (ii) analyzed DFL frameworks to create and evaluate new solutions; and (iii) reviewed application scenarios using DFL. Thus, this article identifies and analyzes the main fundamentals of DFL in terms of federation architectures, topologies, communication mechanisms, security approaches, and key performance indicators. Additionally, the paper at hand explores existing mechanisms to optimize critical DFL fundamentals. Then, the most relevant features of the current DFL frameworks are reviewed and compared. After that, it analyzes the most used DFL application scenarios, identifying solutions based on the fundamentals and frameworks previously defined. Finally, the evolution of existing DFL solutions is studied to provide a list of trends, lessons learned, and open challenges.
Authors
Keywords
Related publications
Works with stronger overlap in topic, type, and tags.
ICC 2025 - IEEE International Conference on Communications
ProFe: Communication-Efficient Decentralized Federated Learning via Distillation and Prototypes
Pedro Miguel Sánchez Sánchez, Enrique Tomás Martínez Beltrán, Miguel Fernández Llamas, Gérôme Bovet, Gregorio Martínez Pérez, Alberto Huertas Celdrán
IEEE Communications Magazine
Flighter: Decentralized Federated Learning and Situational Awareness for Secure Military Aerial Reconnaissance
Enrique Tomás Martínez Beltrán, Pedro Miguel Sánchez Sánchez, Gérôme Bovet, Burkhard Stiller, Gregorio Martínez Pérez, Alberto Huertas Celdrán
Mosaic warfare is a military strategy where reconnaissance missions with aerial vehicles are critical for gathering enemy information and achieving battlefield dominance. Nowadays, machine learning (ML) techniques play a...
Array
DART: A Solution for decentralized federated learning model robustness analysis
Chao Feng, Alberto Huertas Celdrán, Jan von der Assen, Enrique Tomás Martínez Beltrán, Gérôme Bovet, Burkhard Stiller
Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising approach to address privacy concerns inherent in Machine Learning (ML) practices. However, conventional FL methods, particularly those following the Centralized FL (CFL)...
Related Research

Nov 2025 — Jun 2026
COBRA V2: Gamified and Customizable Hyperrealistic Cyber Range Simulations of APTs
Develops adaptive training environments and realistic Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) simulation tools using gamification mechanics.

Apr 2023 — Nov 2023
DEFENDIS: Decentralized Federated Learning for IoT Device Identification and Security
DEFENDIS develops a framework for uniquely identifying IoT devices in a distributed manner while solving security threats through decentralized federated learning.

Nov 2024 — Jan 2028
ECYSAP EYE: European Cyber Situational Awareness Platform - Enhanced Cyberspace Operations
An architectural evolution of the European cyber situational awareness platform into a modular System of Systems to support military missions.